Usuario discusión:JohnNewton8
For other languages, consider using Wikipedia:Babel
Esperamos que pases buenos momentos en Wikipedia. -- MACS >>> 
12:04 4 abr 2020 (UTC)
Pafsanias[editar]
Hello, sorry, about the fr:Wikipédia:Requête_aux_administrateurs#Harcèlement cross-wiki, I had no time to answer before you blocked me, so I will send you my answer here:
- Sorry I don't speak French but I translated the complaint to be able to read it. The problem is that Mr. Pafsanias (disc. · contr. · bloq.) is misrepresenting the truth (i.e. lies). Arwenz is not my clone, she is a good friend, I live in Spain and she lives in Romania. Please check the IP addresses to verify that. She also doesn't act like a proxy for me and we are ready to prove we are two distinct persons and Arwenz also affirmed her availability to prove in person that she is a real person and that she is capable of making the kind of articles she already created - we can send copies of our passports to the Wikimedia Foundation. Mr. Pafsanias is misrepresenting the truth all the time and he believes he can trick everyone, forever, to believe in his misrepresentations. He called Arwenz a meatpuppet because she has a similar way of defending against accusations like I do - she learned it from me. The definition of meatpuppet says "a new user invited to an internet discussion solely to influence it, similar to a sockpuppet" - she never tried to influence anything, she just defended herself against accusations and she is free to learn from me or from anyone else how to argue based on evidence and logic. Mr. Pafsanias claims that you have no right to defend yourself in front of accusations because "your answer is too long for him to read" and lately he even claims that answering to him is nothing else than "harassment". Also, Arwenz was blocked on Romanian Wikipedia by his friend Dan Mihai Pitea (disc. · contr. · bloq.), against the consensus of the community, and the conversation about blocking her is not even finished. Yet Mr. Pafsanias claims that Arwenz has no right to defend herself, even though the debate about her status is not yet concluded. Another misrepresentation. When accusing Arwenz he claims that such a verification in person is not possible and that this proposal is somehow a ridiculous fantasy, even though in-person gatherings between Romanian Wikipedians already existed. So he only takes decisions based on his own suspicions and he refuses to see the evidence that proves clearly that Arwenz is not my clone. Unlike his claims, I can prove everything I said here, with links to Romanian Wikipedia - if anyone has the patience to translate/read them. So Mr. Pafsanias doesn't care about evidence, he is misrepresenting the truth, he actually dictates the truth like he is a some kind of supreme authority, he spontaneously re-defines the meaning of words as he pleases, he claims that actually answering to his accusations is against the rules of community and lately he claims it is also harassement. Lately he believes that making administrative decisions without the consensus of the community is absolutely fine and he unilateraly decides that a conversation is over whenever he pleases. That on top of talking with despise, defiant and from above. It is very intriguing that he believes he can trick everyone, forever, to believe that he is right when acting like this. Have a nice day! Barecode (discusión) 14:11 14 nov 2022 (UTC)