Ir al contenido

Usuaria:Jaluj/Brecha de genero enlaces

De Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
[editar]

Research studies/writings on similar topics and/or communities

[editar]
[editar]

Misogyny and internet harassment

[editar]
  • Violet Blue, "Quora's misogyny problem: A cautionary tale", ZDNet, June 22, 2014. Quote: "Sites that care can educate their admins and mods about online harassment, on detecting racist and sexist language, on conflict resolution and conflict diffusion, target and non-target status, and backhanded attacks (aka 'poisoning the well')."
  • Maeve Duggan, "Online Harassment", Pew Research Internet Project, October 22, 2014. Survey by the Pew Research Center. (See Slate review below.)
[editar]
  • "Harassment", U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Description of offensive conduct regarded as employment discrimination that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, (ADA).
  • "Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines", Mozilla, January 7, 2013. "Inclusion and Diversity Program" (how to report problems), expected interaction style, and the "Conductors group" for training people to communicate.
  • Eugene Volokh, "Freedom of Speech in Cyberspace from the Listener's Perspective" U Chicago Legal Forum 377, 414-21, 1996. A collection of examples--mostly excerpts from published law review articles--of how workplace harassment law is increasingly being applied to areas outside of the workplace: "public accommodations" like libraries, restaurants, bookstores, and online services.
  • Ellen Simon, "Gender Based Profanity Constitutes Sexual Harassment" Employee Rights Post, January 27, 2010. Review of Reeves v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. "A constant flow of profanity in the workplace can constitute sexual harassment and gender discrimination" regardless of whether it is addressed to anyone directly.

Wikimedia.org projects

[editar]

Gender gap projects

[editar]

Diversity projects

[editar]

Outreach project

[editar]

Wikimedia blog entries

[editar]

Sue Gardner essays

[editar]

Sue Gardner was executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation) from 2007 to 2014 and lead the Wikimedia Foundation's initial efforts to close the gender gap. These essays from her blog provide an insight on her thinking about the gender gap during that period.

Wikimania

[editar]
  • Wikimania. The last several years have included several workshops and speeches about the gendergap.
  • WikiWomen's lunches have been held at several Wikimanias

En.Wikipedia Gender gap projects

[editar]

Wikiprojects

[editar]

See links to English-language Wikipedia Gender gap-related wikiprojects on the Gender gap task force main page.

Resources

[editar]

See links to English-language Wikipedia Gender gap-related resources on the Gender gap task force main page.

Sign Post articles

[editar]

Wikipedia articles

[editar]

Relevant essays

[editar]

Women-related article lists

[editar]

Workshops and Edit-a-thons

[editar]

(Small sample of selected events of interest.)

Help pages

[editar]
Audio and video
Images

Civility issues

[editar]

These are of particular interest to many women and men.

At Wikimedia Foundation

[editar]

At Wikimedia.org

[editar]
  • According to New York Magazine in 2014, "Wikipedia famously bears one of the starkest gender gaps in contemporary culture."[1]​ Estimates of the percentage of Wikipedians who are female range from 8.5 to 16.1 percent.[2]

The gender gap means not only that most articles are written by men, but that most of the content policies are too, including the notability and sourcing policies. These policies determine which articles about women can be hosted, and frame how they are written and sourced. As of January 2015 just 15.5 percent of the 1,445,021 biographies on the English Wikipedia were about women. As a result of notability and sourcing issues, almost all Wikipedia's pre-20th-century biographies are of men.[3]

Forthcoming

[editar]

2015

[editar]

September–July

[editar]

June–April

[editar]

March–January

[editar]

2014

[editar]

December–October

[editar]

September–July

[editar]

June–April

[editar]

March–January

[editar]

2013

[editar]

December–October

[editar]

September–July

[editar]

June–April

[editar]

March–January

[editar]

2012

[editar]

2011

[editar]

2010

[editar]

2009

[editar]

2008

[editar]

Otros artículos

[editar]
German
Italian
Spanish

Studies, books (alphabetical)

[editar]
The following are also listed above.

Wikimedia Foundation-sponsored studies

[editar]

Foundation editor survey 2009

Foundation editor survey 2010

  • Ruediger Glott, Philipp Schmidt, Rishab Ghosh, Wikipedia survey overview, UNU-MERIT (with Wikimedia Foundation), Maastricht, Netherlands, March 2010. Over 58,000 self-selected Wikipedians from 22 language editions in 231 countries responded; contributors reported as about 87% men and 13% women); (Archived original), accessed August 14, 2014.

Foundation editor survey 2011-#1

Foundation editor survey 2011-#2

Foundation editor survey 2012

Other Wikimedia studies

About Wikimedia Foundation funding of Gender Gap research

[editar]

Outside studies

[editar]
  • Judd Antin, Raymond Yee, Coye Cheshire, Oded Nov, "Gender Differences in Wikipedia Editing", WikiSym’11, October 3-5, 2011, study funded by Research Fund at UC Berkeley. Perhaps the most significant finding is that male editors tend to make an edit followed by revisions to that edit, whereas women tend to make single, larger edits and less revisions.
  • H. T. Welser, D. Cosley, G. Kossinets, A. Lin, F. Dokshin, G. Gay, and M. Smith, Finding social roles in Wikipedia, Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, page 122-129, 2011. (Provides interesting context.)
  • Lam, S.; Uduwage, A.; Dong, Z.; Sen, S.; Musicant, D.; Terveen, L.; Reidl, J. (October 2011). «WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia’s Gender Imbalance». WikiSym '11 (ACM). «Quote: "culture that may be resistant to female participation."».  (Notes that contributions of users who identified as women are significantly more likely to be challenged or undone by fellow editors, according to a 2011 report by the University of Minnesota.)
  • Collier, B., & Bear, J. (2012). “Conflict, criticism, or confidence”. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work- CSCW ’12 (p. 383). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. DOI
  • Sook Lim; Nahyun Kwon (2010). «Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source?». Library and Information Science Research 32 (3): 212-220.  DOI
  • "Gender gap coverage in media and blogs" section of a December 5, 2013 Wikimedia blog entry summarizes article. In short: based on a qualitative analysis of 42 articles from US news media and blogs, and 1,336 comments from online readers authors see a “broader backlash against women, and particularly feminism” in the U.S. news media and blogs. They question whether the Wikimedia Foundation is properly addressing the issue.

In progress

  • Julia Adams, Hannah Brueckner, “Wikipedia and the Democratization of Academic Knowledge”, a two-year National Science Foundation grant for exploring gender-specific patterns of representation of scholars and scholarship. One of the project’s goals is to contribute to improving quality and reducing bias on academic – and more general – Wikipedia."

References

[editar]
  1. Kat Stoeffel, "Closing Wikipedia’s Gender Gap — Reluctantly", New York Magazine, 11 February 2014.
  2. For 8.1 percent, "Wikipedia Editors' Survey", Wikimedia Foundation, April 2011, p. 2.

    For 16.1 percent, Benjamin Mako Hill, Aaron Shaw, "The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation", PLOS ONE, 26 June 2013.

  3. Eduardo Graells-Garrido, Mounia Lalmas, Filippo Menczer, "First Women, Second Sex: Gender Bias in Wikipedia", arXiv, 9 February 2015, p. 3.