Diferencia entre revisiones de «Primera impresión»

De Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
Contenido eliminado Contenido añadido
DamyLechu (discusión · contribs.)
DamyLechu (discusión · contribs.)
Sin resumen de edición
Línea 4: Línea 4:


Las primeras impresiones suelen basarse en una amplia gama de características: edad, raza, [[cultura]], [[idioma]], [[Género (ciencias sociales)|género]], [[apariencia física]], [[acento]], [[Postura (psicología)|postura]], [[Voz (fonología)|voz]], número de personas presentes y tiempo permitido para procesar.<ref name="Mackie" /><ref name="Aronson">{{Cita libro|apellidos=Aronson|nombre=Elliot, Robin M. Akert, Timothy D. Wilson|título=Social psychology|url=http://wps.prenhall.com/hss_aronson_socpsych_6/64/16425/4205041.cw/-/t/index.html|fechaacceso=05/08/14|fecha=2007|editorial=Pearson Prentice-Hall|isbn=0132382458|ubicación=Upper Saddle River, NJ|edición=6th}}</ref><ref name="Biesanz">{{Cita publicación|título=Do we know when our impressions of others are valid? evidence for realistic accuracy awareness in first impressions of personality|apellidos=Biesanz|nombre=J.C.|apellidos2=Human, L. J.|fecha=2011|publicación=Social Psychological and Personality Science|volumen=2|número=5|páginas=452–459|doi=10.1177/1948550610397211|apellidos3=Paquin, A.|apellidos4=Chan, M.|apellidos5=Parisotto, K. L.|apellidos6=Sarracino, J.|apellidos7=Gillis, R. L.}}</ref><ref name="Bhargrave">{{Cita publicación|título=The social context of temporal sequences: Why first impressions shape shared experiences|apellidos=Bhargrave|nombre=R|apellidos2=Montgomery, N.V.|publicación=Journal of Consumer Research|volumen=40|número=3|páginas=501–517|doi=10.1086/671053}}</ref><ref name="Ding">{{Cita publicación|título=Gay, Straight, or Somewhere in Between: Accuracy and Bias in the Perception of Bisexual Faces|apellidos=Ding|nombre=Jonathan Y. C.|apellidos2=Rule, Nicholas O.|fecha=12 January 2012|publicación=Journal of Nonverbal Behavior|volumen=36|número=2|páginas=165–176|doi=10.1007/s10919-011-0129-y}}</ref><ref name="Naumann">{{Cita publicación|título=Personality Judgments Based on Physical Appearance|apellidos=Naumann|nombre=L. P.|apellidos2=Vazire, S.|fecha=17 September 2009|publicación=Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin|volumen=35|número=12|páginas=1661–1671|doi=10.1177/0146167209346309|pmid=19762717|apellidos3=Rentfrow, P. J.|apellidos4=Gosling, S. D.}}</ref><ref name="Trudeau">{{Cita noticia|apellidos=Trudeau|nombre=M.|título=You Had Me At Hello: The Science Behind First Impressions|url=https://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/05/05/308349318/you-had-me-at-hello-the-science-behind-first-impressions|fecha=5 May 2014|fechaacceso=6 May 2014}}</ref> Las primeras impresiones que los individuos dan a otros podrían influir enormemente en la forma en que son tratados y vistos en muchos contextos de la vida cotidiana.<ref name="Guadagno">{{Cita publicación|título=Gender Differences in Impression Management in Organizations: A Qualitative Review|apellidos=Guadagno|nombre=Rosanna E.|apellidos2=Cialdini, Robert B.|fecha=21 March 2007|publicación=Sex Roles|volumen=56|número=7–8|páginas=483–494|doi=10.1007/s11199-007-9187-3}}</ref><ref name="Wood">{{Cita publicación|título=Exploring the role of first impressions in rater-based assessments|apellidos=Wood|nombre=T.J.|fecha=August 2014|publicación=Advances in Health Sciences Education|volumen=19|número=3|páginas=409–427|doi=10.1007/s10459-013-9453-9}}</ref>
Las primeras impresiones suelen basarse en una amplia gama de características: edad, raza, [[cultura]], [[idioma]], [[Género (ciencias sociales)|género]], [[apariencia física]], [[acento]], [[Postura (psicología)|postura]], [[Voz (fonología)|voz]], número de personas presentes y tiempo permitido para procesar.<ref name="Mackie" /><ref name="Aronson">{{Cita libro|apellidos=Aronson|nombre=Elliot, Robin M. Akert, Timothy D. Wilson|título=Social psychology|url=http://wps.prenhall.com/hss_aronson_socpsych_6/64/16425/4205041.cw/-/t/index.html|fechaacceso=05/08/14|fecha=2007|editorial=Pearson Prentice-Hall|isbn=0132382458|ubicación=Upper Saddle River, NJ|edición=6th}}</ref><ref name="Biesanz">{{Cita publicación|título=Do we know when our impressions of others are valid? evidence for realistic accuracy awareness in first impressions of personality|apellidos=Biesanz|nombre=J.C.|apellidos2=Human, L. J.|fecha=2011|publicación=Social Psychological and Personality Science|volumen=2|número=5|páginas=452–459|doi=10.1177/1948550610397211|apellidos3=Paquin, A.|apellidos4=Chan, M.|apellidos5=Parisotto, K. L.|apellidos6=Sarracino, J.|apellidos7=Gillis, R. L.}}</ref><ref name="Bhargrave">{{Cita publicación|título=The social context of temporal sequences: Why first impressions shape shared experiences|apellidos=Bhargrave|nombre=R|apellidos2=Montgomery, N.V.|publicación=Journal of Consumer Research|volumen=40|número=3|páginas=501–517|doi=10.1086/671053}}</ref><ref name="Ding">{{Cita publicación|título=Gay, Straight, or Somewhere in Between: Accuracy and Bias in the Perception of Bisexual Faces|apellidos=Ding|nombre=Jonathan Y. C.|apellidos2=Rule, Nicholas O.|fecha=12 January 2012|publicación=Journal of Nonverbal Behavior|volumen=36|número=2|páginas=165–176|doi=10.1007/s10919-011-0129-y}}</ref><ref name="Naumann">{{Cita publicación|título=Personality Judgments Based on Physical Appearance|apellidos=Naumann|nombre=L. P.|apellidos2=Vazire, S.|fecha=17 September 2009|publicación=Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin|volumen=35|número=12|páginas=1661–1671|doi=10.1177/0146167209346309|pmid=19762717|apellidos3=Rentfrow, P. J.|apellidos4=Gosling, S. D.}}</ref><ref name="Trudeau">{{Cita noticia|apellidos=Trudeau|nombre=M.|título=You Had Me At Hello: The Science Behind First Impressions|url=https://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/05/05/308349318/you-had-me-at-hello-the-science-behind-first-impressions|fecha=5 May 2014|fechaacceso=6 May 2014}}</ref> Las primeras impresiones que los individuos dan a otros podrían influir enormemente en la forma en que son tratados y vistos en muchos contextos de la vida cotidiana.<ref name="Guadagno">{{Cita publicación|título=Gender Differences in Impression Management in Organizations: A Qualitative Review|apellidos=Guadagno|nombre=Rosanna E.|apellidos2=Cialdini, Robert B.|fecha=21 March 2007|publicación=Sex Roles|volumen=56|número=7–8|páginas=483–494|doi=10.1007/s11199-007-9187-3}}</ref><ref name="Wood">{{Cita publicación|título=Exploring the role of first impressions in rater-based assessments|apellidos=Wood|nombre=T.J.|fecha=August 2014|publicación=Advances in Health Sciences Education|volumen=19|número=3|páginas=409–427|doi=10.1007/s10459-013-9453-9}}</ref>

== Velocidad y precisión ==
Solo toma una décima de segundo la acción de juzgar a alguien y dar una primera impresión.<ref name="Willis">{{cite journal|last=Willis|first=J.|author2=Todorov, A.|title=First impressions: Making up your mind after 100 ms exposure to a face|journal=Psychological Science|date=2006|volume=17|pages=592–598.|url=http://psych.princeton.edu/psychology/research/todorov/pdf/Willis&Todorov-PsychScience.pdf|accessdate=17 May 2014|doi=10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x|pmid=16866745}}</ref> Ciertas investigaciones encuentran que cuanto más tiempo se toman los participantes para formar la impresión, más confianza tienen en las impresiones que recolectan.<ref name="Willis" /><ref name="Wargo">{{cite journal|last=Wargo|first=E|title=How many seconds to a first impression?|journal=The Observer|date=2006|volume=19|url=http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2006/july-06/how-many-seconds-to-a-first-impression.html}}</ref> Las personas no solo son rápidas para formar las primeras impresiones, sino que también son bastante precisas cuando el objetivo se presenta a sí mismo de manera genuina. Generalmente no hay mucha precisión para percibir emociones fingidas o para detectar mentiras.<ref name="Carlin2" />

La velocidad a la que se detectan las diferentes cualidades en las primeras impresiones puede estar vinculada a lo que ha sido importante para la supervivencia desde una perspectiva evolutiva.<ref name="Willis" /> Por ejemplo, la confiabilidad y el atractivo fueron los dos rasgos que se detectaron y evaluaron más rápidamente en un estudio de rostros humanos.<ref name="Willis" /><ref name="Wargo" /> Las personas son bastante buenas para evaluar los rasgos de personalidad de los demás en general, pero parece haber una diferencia en los juicios de primera impresión entre adultos mayores y jóvenes. Los adultos mayores consideraron que las fotos de los adultos jóvenes son más saludables, más confiables y menos hostiles, pero más agresivas, que los adultos más jóvenes hicieron de las mismas fotos.<ref name="Zebrowitz2">{{cite journal|last=Zebrowitz|first=Leslie A.|author2=Franklin, Robert G.|author3=Hillman, Suzanne|author4=Boc, Henry|title=Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: Similar in agreement but different in positivity.|journal=Psychology and Aging|volume=28|issue=1|pages=202–212|doi=10.1037/a0030927|pmc=3968687}}</ref> Los adultos mayores pueden tener una menor respuesta a las señales negativas debido a una velocidad de procesamiento más lenta, lo que hace que vean las características faciales en los adultos jóvenes como más positivas que los adultos más jóvenes.<ref name="Zebrowitz2" />

== Número de observadores ==
Las primeras impresiones se ven afectadas independientemente si la persona en cuestión está sola o con cualquier número de personas.<ref name="Bhargrave2" /> Las experiencias conjuntas se procesan más globalmente (ver [[precedencia global]]), como en las culturas colectivistas. El procesamiento global enfatiza más las primeras impresiones porque la primera impresión colectiva tiende a permanecer estable en el tiempo. Las experiencias individuales tienden a facilitar el procesamiento local, lo que hace que el espectador tenga una visión más crítica del objetivo. Por lo tanto, es más probable que los individuos tengan primeras impresiones negativas que los grupos de dos o más espectadores del mismo objetivo. Al mismo tiempo, es más probable que los individuos experimenten una tendencia ascendente en el transcurso de una serie de impresiones.<ref name="Bhargrave2" />

Al ver obras de arte en un experimento, los participantes en un contexto individual calificaron el arte en una secuencia de mejora significativamente más alta que cuando los objetivos se presentan en una secuencia en declive.<ref name="Bhargrave2" /> Al ver el arte en un contexto conjunto, los participantes evaluaron la primera y la última pieza de manera similar en ambos tipos de secuencia. Basta con preparar a los espectadores para que se sientan como si estuvieran en contextos individuales o conjuntos o para que los procesen [[Analítica anticipativa|analíticamente]] o de forma [[Holismo|holística]] fue suficiente para producir los mismos efectos de visualización.<ref name="Bhargrave2" />

== Influencias culturales ==

=== Individualismo contra colectivismo ===
Similar to the number of viewers present, [[collectivism]] versus [[individualism]] can influence impression formation.<ref name="Aronson2" /> Collectivists are at ease as long as their impressions are largely in alignment with the larger group's impressions. When a collectivist wants to change his/her impression, he/she may be compelled to change the views of all group members.<ref name="Fang">{{cite journal|last=Fang|first=X.|author2=Rajkumar, T. M.|title=The Role of National Culture and Multimedia on First Impression Bias Reduction: An Experimental Study in US and China|journal=IEEE Transactions On Professional Communication|date=2013|volume=56|issue=4|pages=354–371|doi=10.1109/TPC.2013.2251503}}</ref> However, this could be challenging for collectivists, who tend to be less confrontational than individualists. Individualists are willing to change their own views at will and are generally more comfortable with uncertainty, which makes them naturally more willing to change their impressions.<ref name="Fang" />

=== Influencia de la riqueza mediática ===
Research is mixed on whether national culture mediates the relationship between media richness and bias in impression formation. Some studies that manipulated media richness have found that information presented in text form yields similar impressions (measured by reported appraisal scores) among cultures,<ref name="Fang" /> while other studies found that richer forms of information such as videos reduce cross-cultural bias more effectively.<ref name="Lim">{{cite journal|last=Lim|first=K. H.|author2=Benbasat, I.|author3=Ward, L. M.|title=The role of multimedia in changing first impression bias|journal=Information Systems Research|date=2000|volume=11|issue=2|pages=115–136|doi=10.1287/isre.11.2.115.11776}}</ref> The latter findings support [[Media Richness Theory]].<ref name="Lim" />

=== El habla y sus acentos ===
Accents and unique speech patterns can influence how people are perceived by those to whom they are speaking. For example, when hypothetically interviewing an applicant with a Midwestern U.S. accent, Colombian accent, or French accent, Midwestern U.S. participants evaluated the U.S. accent as significantly more positive than the applicant with the French accent due to perceived similarity to themselves.<ref name="Deprez-Sims">{{cite journal|last=Deprez-Sims|first=Anne-Sophie|author2=Morris, Scott B.|title=Accents in the workplace: Their effects during a job interview|journal=International Journal of Psychology|volume=45|issue=6|pages=417–426|doi=10.1080/00207594.2010.499950}}</ref> The evaluation of the applicant with the Colombian accent did not, however, differ significantly from the other two. First impressions can be heavily influenced by a similarity-attraction hypothesis where others are immediately put into “similar" or “dissimilar” categories from the viewer and judged accordingly.<ref name="Deprez-Sims" />

=== Características físicas de la personalidad ===
Although populations from different cultures can be quick to view others as dissimilar, there are several first impression characteristics that are universal across cultures.<ref name="Aronson2" /> When comparing trait impressions of faces among U.S. and the culturally isolated Tsimane' people of Bolivia, there was between-culture agreement when ascribing certain physical features to descriptive traits such as attractiveness, intelligence, health, and warmth.<ref name="Zebrowitz">{{cite journal|last=Zebrowitz|first=L. A.|author2=Wang, R.|author3=Bronstad, P. M.|author4=Eisenberg, D.|author5=Undurraga, E.|author6=Reyes-Garcia, V.|author7=Godoy, R.|title=First Impressions From Faces Among U.S. and Culturally Isolated Tsimane' People in the Bolivian Rainforest|journal=Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology|date=19 December 2011|volume=43|issue=1|pages=119–134|doi=10.1177/0022022111411386}}</ref> Both cultures also show a strong attractiveness halo when forming impressions, meaning that those seen as attractive were also rated as more competent, sociable, intelligent, and healthy.<ref name="Zebrowitz" />

== Apariencia física ==

=== Rostros y características ===
Physical appearance gives us clear clues as to a person's personality without him/her ever having to speak or move.<ref name="Aronson2" /><ref name="Ding2" /><ref name="Naumann2" /><ref name="Workman">{{cite journal|last=Workman|first=J. E.|author2=Johnson, K. K. P.|title=The Role of Cosmetics in Impression Formation|journal=Clothing and Textiles Research Journal|date=1 September 1991|volume=10|issue=1|pages=63–67|doi=10.1177/0887302X9101000109}}</ref> Women tend to be better than men at judging nonverbal behavior.<ref name="Aronson2" /> After viewing pictures of people in a neutral position and in a self-chosen posed position, observers were accurate at judging the target's levels of [[extraversion]], emotional stability, openness, [[self-esteem]], and religiosity.<ref name="Naumann2" /> The combined impression of physical characteristics, body posture, facial expression, and clothing choices lets observers form accurate images of a target's personality, so long as the person observed is presenting themselves genuinely.<ref name="Naumann2" /><ref name="Carlin2" /> However, there is some conflicting data in this field. Other evidence suggests that people sometimes rely too much on appearance cues over actual information.<ref name="Olivola">{{cite journal|last=Olivola|first=Christopher Y.|author2=Todorov, Alexander|title=Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences|journal=Journal of Experimental Social Psychology|volume=46|issue=2|pages=315–324|doi=10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.002}}</ref><ref name="Todorov">{{cite journal|last=Todorov|first=A.|title=Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes|journal=Science|date=10 June 2005|volume=308|issue=5728|pages=1623–1626|doi=10.1126/science.1110589}}</ref> When provided with descriptive information about a target, participants still rely on physical appearance cues when making judgments about others' personalities and capabilities. Participants struggle to look past physical appearance cues even when they know information contrary to their initial judgment.<ref name="Olivola" /> Physical cues are also used to make judgments about political candidates based on extremely brief exposures to their pictures.<ref name="Todorov" /> Perceived competence level of a candidate measured from first impressions of facial features can directly predict voting results.<ref name="Todorov" />

The “beautiful is good” effect is a very present phenomenon when dealing with first impressions of others.<ref name="Aronson2" /> Targets who are attractive are rated more positively and as possessing more unique characteristics than those who are unattractive.<ref name="Lorenzo">{{cite journal|last=Lorenzo|first=G. L.|author2=Biesanz, J. C.|author3=Human, L. J.|title=What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood: Physical Attractiveness and Accuracy in First Impressions of Personality|journal=Psychological Science|date=4 November 2010|volume=21|issue=12|pages=1777–1782|doi=10.1177/0956797610388048|pmid=21051521}}</ref> Beauty is also found to be somewhat subjective so that even targets who are not universally attractive can receive the benefit of this effect if the observer is attracted to them.<ref name="Lorenzo" />

In a 2014 study, a group at the [[University of York]] reported that impressions of the traits of approachability, youthfulness/attractiveness and dominance can be formed from measurable characteristics such as the shape of and the spacing around the eyes, nose and mouth.<ref name="cnn">{{cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2014/07/29/health/first-impressions-facial-features/|title=First impressions connected to facial features - CNN.com|publisher=Edition.cnn.com|accessdate=1 August 2014}}</ref> it was found that first impressions of social traits, such as trustworthiness or dominance, are reliably perceived in faces. Physical facial features were objectively measured from feature positions and colours. A neural network was used to model the dimensions of approachability, youthful-attractiveness and dominance. 58% of the variance in raters’ impressions was accounted for by this linear model.<ref>{{cite journal|url=http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/07/23/1409860111|title=Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images|date=2014-07-28|accessdate=1 August 2014|doi=10.1073/pnas.1409860111|volume=111|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|pages=E3353–E3361|pmc=4136614}}</ref>

=== Cosmética y confección ===
Cosmetic use is also an important cue for forming impressions, particularly of women. Those wearing heavy makeup are seen as significantly more feminine than those wearing moderate makeup or no makeup and those wearing heavy or moderate makeup are seen as more attractive than those wearing no makeup.<ref name="Workman" /> While a woman wearing no makeup is perceived as being more moral than the other two conditions, there is no difference between experimental conditions when judging personality or personal temperament.<ref name="Workman" />

First impression formation can be influenced by the use of cognitive short hands such as [[stereotypes]] and [[Representative heuristic|representative heuristics]].<ref name="Aronson2" /> When asked to rate the [[socioeconomic status]] (SES) and degree of interest in friendship with African American and Caucasian female models wearing either a [[K-Mart]], [[Abercrombie & Fitch]], or non-logoed sweatshirt, Caucasian models were rated more favorably than the African American models.<ref name="McDermott">{{cite journal|last=McDermott|first=L.|author2=Pettijohn, T.|title=The influence of clothing fashion and race on the perceived socioeconomic status and person perception of college students|journal=Psychology & Society|date=2011|volume=4|pages=64–75}}</ref> Abercrombie & Fitch wearers were rated as higher SES than the other sweatshirts. Participants wanted to be friends with the Caucasian model most when she was wearing a plain sweatshirt and the African American model most when she was wearing either the plain or K-Mart sweatshirt. It is unclear why the plain sweatshirt was most associated with friendship, but the general results suggest that mismatching class and race reduced the model's friendship appeal.<ref name="McDermott" />

== Contextos específicos ==

=== Internet ===
Online profiles and communication channels such as email provide fewer cues than in-person interactions, which makes targets more difficult to understand.<ref name="Aronson2" /> When research participants were asked to evaluate a person's facial attractiveness and perceived ambition based on an online dating profile, amount of time permitted for processing and reporting an evaluation of the target produced a difference in impression formation.<ref name="Sritharan">{{cite journal|last=Sritharan|first=R.|author2=Heilpern, K.|author3=Wilbur, C. J.|author4=Gawronski, B.|title=I think I like you: Spontaneous and deliberate evaluations of potential romantic partners in an online dating context|journal=European Journal of Social Psychology|date=2010|volume=40|pages=1062–1077|doi=10.1002/ejsp.703}}</ref> Spontaneous evaluations relied on physical attractiveness almost exclusively, whereas deliberate evaluations weighed both types of information. Although deliberate evaluations used the information provided on both physical attractiveness and ambition of each target, the particular impact of each kind of information appeared to depend on the consistency between the two. A significant effect of attractiveness on deliberate evaluations was found only when perceived ambition was consistent with the perceived level of attractiveness.<ref name="Sritharan" /> The consistency found in profiles seemed to particularly influence deliberate evaluations.

In a study of online impressions, participants who were socially expressive and disclosed a lot about themselves both on their webpages and in person were better liked than those who were less open. Social expressivity includes liveliness in voice, smiling, etc.<ref name="Weisbuch">{{cite journal|last=Weisbuch|first=M.|author2=Ivcevic, Z.|author3=Ambady, N.|title=On being liked on the web and in the 'real world': Consistency in first impressions across personal web pages and spontaneous behavior|journal=Journal of Experimental Social Psychology|date=2009|volume=45|issue=3|pages=573–576|doi=10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.009}}</ref>

=== Citas y sexualidad ===
Upon seeing photographs of straight, gay, and bisexual people, participants correctly identified gay versus straight males and females at above-chance levels based solely on seeing a picture of their face, however, bisexual targets were only identified at chance. The findings suggest a straight-non straight dichotomy in the categorization of sexual orientation.<ref name="Ding2" />

The more time participants are allowed to make some judgment about a person, the more they will weigh information beyond physical appearance. Specific manipulations include identifying men as gay versus straight<ref name="Wood2014">{{cite web|last=Wood|first=J.|title=The Power of a First Impression|url=http://psychcentral.com/news/2014/02/15/the-power-of-a-first-impression/65944.html|publisher=Psych Central|accessdate=6 May 2014}}</ref> and people as trustworthy or not.<ref name="Biesanz2" /><ref name="Wargo" /> In a study of the interaction between ratings of people in speed dating and the form of media used to present them, impression accuracy in a speed dating task was not significantly different when a potential date was presented in person versus in a video. However, impressions of dates made via video were to be much more negative than those made in person. An additional study that looked at characterization of a romantic partner suggested that people are more likely to rely on “gut reactions” when meeting in person, but there isn't sufficient information for this kind of evaluation when viewing someone online.

=== Profesional ===
Non-verbal behaviors are particularly important to forming first impressions when meeting a business acquaintance.<ref name="Goman">{{cite book|last=Goman|first=Carol Kinsey|title=The nonverbal advantage : secrets and science of body language at work|date=2008|publisher=Berrett-Koehler Publishers|location=San Francisco, Calif.|isbn=1576754928|edition=[Online-Ausg.].}}</ref> Specifically, components of social expressivity, such as smiling, eyebrow position, emotional expression, and eye contact are emphasized.<ref name="Carlin2" /><ref name="Weisbuch" /><ref name="Goman" /> Straightening one's posture, leaning in slightly, and giving a firm handshake promotes favorable impression formation in the American business context.<ref name="Goman" /> Other impression management tactics in the business world include researching the organization and interviewers beforehand, preparing specific questions for the interviewer, showing confidence, and dressing appropriately.<ref name="Rowh">{{cite web|last=Rowh|first=Mark|title=First Impressions Count|url=http://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2012/11/first-impressions.aspx|publisher=American Psychological Association|accessdate=18 April 2014}}</ref>

A qualitative review of previous literature looking at self-report data suggests that men and women use [[impression management]] tactics in the corporate world that are consistent with stereotypical gender roles when presenting themselves to others.<ref name="Guadagno2" /> This research proposes that women are put in a double bind where those who portray themselves as more communal and submissive are overlooked for leadership positions and women who try to utilize male tactics (such as being more aggressive) receive negative consequences for violating normative gender roles.<ref name="Guadagno2" /> To change this dynamic the authors suggest that managerial positions should be re-advertised to highlight the feminine qualities needed for a position and staff training should involve a segment accentuating gender issues in the office to make everyone aware of possible discrimination.<ref name="Guadagno2" />

Data collected from interviews with physicians distinguishes between first impressions and intuition and contributes to understanding the occurrence of gut feelings in the medical field.<ref name="Woolley">{{cite journal|last=Woolley|first=A.|author2=Kostopoulou, O.|title=Clinical intuition in family medicine: More than first impressions|journal=Annals of Family Medicine|date=2013|volume=11|pages=60–66|doi=10.1370/afm.1433}}</ref> Gut feelings go beyond first impressions: Physicians expressed feeling doubtful about their initial impressions as they gathered more data from their patients. More experienced physicians reported more instances of gut feelings than those less experienced, but the quality of the intuition was related to the quality of feedback received during the data collection process in general. Emotional engagement enhanced learning just as it does in first impressions.<ref name="Woolley" />

== Neurociencias ==
First impressions are formed within milliseconds of seeing a target. When intentionally forming a first impression, encoding relies on the dorsomedial [[prefrontal cortex]] (dmPFC).<ref name="Gilron">{{cite journal|last=Gilron|first=R.|author2=Gutchess, A. H.|title=Remembering first impressions: Effects of intentionality and diagnosticity on subsequent memory|journal=Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience|date=2012|volume=12|issue=1|pages=85–98|doi=10.3758/s13415-011-0074-6}}</ref> Readings from [[FMRI|fMRIs]] of research participants show that processing of diagnostic information (e.g. distinguishing features) engaged the dmPFC more than processing neutral information.<ref name="Gilron" />

Participants generally formed more negative impressions of the faces that showed a negative emotion compared to neutral faces.<ref name="Iidaka">{{cite journal|last=Iidaka|first=T.|author2=Harada, T.|author3=Sadato, N.|title=Forming a negative impression of another person correlates with activation in medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala|journal=Social Cognitive and Affective Neurosciene|date=2011|volume=6|issue=4|pages=516–525|doi=10.1093/scan/nsq072}}</ref> Results suggest that the dmPFC and [[amygdala]] together play a large role in negative impression formation. When forming immediate impressions based on emotion, the stimulus can bypass the [[neo-cortex]] by way of the “[[amygdala hijack]].”<ref name="Goleman">{{cite book|last=Goleman|first=Daniel|title=Working with Emotional Intelligence|date=1999|page=87}}</ref>

=== Familiaridad ===
Research indicates that people are efficient evaluators when forming impressions based on existing biases.<ref name="Schiller">{{cite journal|last=Schiller|first=D.|author2=Freeman, J. B.|author3=Mitchell, J. P.|author4=Uleman, J. S.|author5=Phelps, E. A.|title=A neural mechanism of first impressions|journal=Nature Neuroscience|date=2009|volume=12|pages=508–514|doi=10.1038/nn.2278}}</ref> The [[posterior cingulate cortex]] (PCC), amygdala, and the thalamus sort relevant versus irrelevant information according to these biases. The dmPFC is also involved in the impression formation process, especially with person-descriptive information.<ref name="Schiller" />

FMRI results show activation of the fusiform cortex, [[posterior cingulate gyrus]], and amygdala when individuals are asked to identify previously seen faces that were encoded as either “friends” or “foes.”<ref name="Vrticka">{{cite journal|last=Vrticka|first=Pascal|author2=Andersson, Frédéric|author3=Sander, David|author4=Vuilleumier, Patrik|title=Memory for friends or foes: The social context of past encounters with faces modulates their subsequent neural traces in the brain|journal=Social Neuroscience|volume=4|issue=5|pages=384–401|doi=10.1080/17470910902941793}}</ref> Additionally, the caudate and [[anterior cingulate cortex]] are more activated when looking at faces of “foes” versus “friends."<ref name="Vrticka" /> This research suggests that quick first impressions of hostility or support from unknown people can lead to long-term effects on memory that will later be associated with that person.

=== Alcohol e impresiones ===
[[Alcohol]] consumption and belief of consumption influenced [[emotion]] detection in ten second clips.<ref name="Walter">{{cite journal|last1=Walter|first1=N.|last2=Mutic|first2=S.|last3=Markett|first3=S.|last4=Montag|first4=C.|last5=Klein|first5=A.|last6=Reuter|first6=M.|title=The Influence of Alcohol Intake and Alcohol Expectations on the Recognition of Emotions|date=2011|volume=46|pages=680–685|doi=10.1093/alcalc/agr082|journal=Alcohol and Alcoholism}}</ref> Participants who thought they had consumed an alcoholic beverage rated one facial expression (approximately 3% of the facial expressions they saw) more in each clip as happy compared to the control group. Thus, impression formation may be affected by even the perception of alcohol consumption.<ref name="Walter" />

=== Diferencias interculturales ===
There appears to be cross-cultural similarities in brain responses to first impression formations. In a [[mock election]] both American and Japanese individuals voted for the candidate that elicited a stronger response in their bilateral amygdala than those who did not, regardless of the candidate's culture.<ref name="Rule">{{cite journal|last=Rule|first=N. O.|author2=Freeman, J. B.|author3=Moran, J. M.|author4=Gabrieli, J. D. E.|author5=Adams, R. B.|author6=Ambady, N.|title=Voting behavior is reflected in amygdala response across cultures|journal=Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience|date=5 December 2009|volume=5|issue=2–3|pages=349–355|doi=10.1093/scan/nsp046}}</ref> Individuals also showed a stronger response to cultural outgroup faces than cultural [[ingroup]] faces because the amygdala is presumably more sensitive to novel stimuli.<ref name="Rule" /> However, this finding was unrelated to actual voting decisions.<ref name="Rule" />

== Estabilidad ==
Once formed, first impressions tend to be stable. A review of the literature on the accuracy and impact of first impressions on rater-based assessments found that raters' first impressions are highly correlated with later scores, but it is unclear exactly why.<ref name="Wood2" /> One study tested stability by asking participants to form impressions people based purely on [[photographs]]. Participants' opinions of the people in photographs did not significantly differ after interacting with that person a month later.<ref name="Wood2014" /> One potential reason for this stability is that one's first impressions could serve as a guide for his/her next steps, such as what questions are asked and how raters go about scoring. More research needs to be done on the stability of first impressions to fully understand how first impressions guide subsequent treatment, [[self-fulfilling prophecies]], and the [[halo effect]].<ref name="Aronson2" /> Assessment tools can influence impressions too, for example if a question provides only a dichotomous "yes" or "no" response or if a rater uses a [[scale (ratio)]]. Although this study was conducted with the intention of improving rating methods in medical education, the literature review was sufficiently broad enough to generalize.<ref name="Wood2014" />


== Véase también ==
== Véase también ==

Revisión del 22:31 13 nov 2018

En psicología, una primera impresión es el momento en que una persona se encuentra con otra y forma una concepto de esa persona. La precisión de esa impresión varía según el observador y el objetivo (persona, objeto, escena, etc.) que se observe.[1][2]

Las primeras impresiones suelen basarse en una amplia gama de características: edad, raza, cultura, idioma, género, apariencia física, acento, postura, voz, número de personas presentes y tiempo permitido para procesar.[1][3][4][5][6][7][8]​ Las primeras impresiones que los individuos dan a otros podrían influir enormemente en la forma en que son tratados y vistos en muchos contextos de la vida cotidiana.[9][10]

Velocidad y precisión

Solo toma una décima de segundo la acción de juzgar a alguien y dar una primera impresión.[11]​ Ciertas investigaciones encuentran que cuanto más tiempo se toman los participantes para formar la impresión, más confianza tienen en las impresiones que recolectan.[11][12]​ Las personas no solo son rápidas para formar las primeras impresiones, sino que también son bastante precisas cuando el objetivo se presenta a sí mismo de manera genuina. Generalmente no hay mucha precisión para percibir emociones fingidas o para detectar mentiras.[13]

La velocidad a la que se detectan las diferentes cualidades en las primeras impresiones puede estar vinculada a lo que ha sido importante para la supervivencia desde una perspectiva evolutiva.[11]​ Por ejemplo, la confiabilidad y el atractivo fueron los dos rasgos que se detectaron y evaluaron más rápidamente en un estudio de rostros humanos.[11][12]​ Las personas son bastante buenas para evaluar los rasgos de personalidad de los demás en general, pero parece haber una diferencia en los juicios de primera impresión entre adultos mayores y jóvenes. Los adultos mayores consideraron que las fotos de los adultos jóvenes son más saludables, más confiables y menos hostiles, pero más agresivas, que los adultos más jóvenes hicieron de las mismas fotos.[14]​ Los adultos mayores pueden tener una menor respuesta a las señales negativas debido a una velocidad de procesamiento más lenta, lo que hace que vean las características faciales en los adultos jóvenes como más positivas que los adultos más jóvenes.[14]

Número de observadores

Las primeras impresiones se ven afectadas independientemente si la persona en cuestión está sola o con cualquier número de personas.[15]​ Las experiencias conjuntas se procesan más globalmente (ver precedencia global), como en las culturas colectivistas. El procesamiento global enfatiza más las primeras impresiones porque la primera impresión colectiva tiende a permanecer estable en el tiempo. Las experiencias individuales tienden a facilitar el procesamiento local, lo que hace que el espectador tenga una visión más crítica del objetivo. Por lo tanto, es más probable que los individuos tengan primeras impresiones negativas que los grupos de dos o más espectadores del mismo objetivo. Al mismo tiempo, es más probable que los individuos experimenten una tendencia ascendente en el transcurso de una serie de impresiones.[15]

Al ver obras de arte en un experimento, los participantes en un contexto individual calificaron el arte en una secuencia de mejora significativamente más alta que cuando los objetivos se presentan en una secuencia en declive.[15]​ Al ver el arte en un contexto conjunto, los participantes evaluaron la primera y la última pieza de manera similar en ambos tipos de secuencia. Basta con preparar a los espectadores para que se sientan como si estuvieran en contextos individuales o conjuntos o para que los procesen analíticamente o de forma holística fue suficiente para producir los mismos efectos de visualización.[15]

Influencias culturales

Individualismo contra colectivismo

Similar to the number of viewers present, collectivism versus individualism can influence impression formation.[16]​ Collectivists are at ease as long as their impressions are largely in alignment with the larger group's impressions. When a collectivist wants to change his/her impression, he/she may be compelled to change the views of all group members.[17]​ However, this could be challenging for collectivists, who tend to be less confrontational than individualists. Individualists are willing to change their own views at will and are generally more comfortable with uncertainty, which makes them naturally more willing to change their impressions.[17]

Influencia de la riqueza mediática

Research is mixed on whether national culture mediates the relationship between media richness and bias in impression formation. Some studies that manipulated media richness have found that information presented in text form yields similar impressions (measured by reported appraisal scores) among cultures,[17]​ while other studies found that richer forms of information such as videos reduce cross-cultural bias more effectively.[18]​ The latter findings support Media Richness Theory.[18]

El habla y sus acentos

Accents and unique speech patterns can influence how people are perceived by those to whom they are speaking. For example, when hypothetically interviewing an applicant with a Midwestern U.S. accent, Colombian accent, or French accent, Midwestern U.S. participants evaluated the U.S. accent as significantly more positive than the applicant with the French accent due to perceived similarity to themselves.[19]​ The evaluation of the applicant with the Colombian accent did not, however, differ significantly from the other two. First impressions can be heavily influenced by a similarity-attraction hypothesis where others are immediately put into “similar" or “dissimilar” categories from the viewer and judged accordingly.[19]

Características físicas de la personalidad

Although populations from different cultures can be quick to view others as dissimilar, there are several first impression characteristics that are universal across cultures.[16]​ When comparing trait impressions of faces among U.S. and the culturally isolated Tsimane' people of Bolivia, there was between-culture agreement when ascribing certain physical features to descriptive traits such as attractiveness, intelligence, health, and warmth.[20]​ Both cultures also show a strong attractiveness halo when forming impressions, meaning that those seen as attractive were also rated as more competent, sociable, intelligent, and healthy.[20]

Apariencia física

Rostros y características

Physical appearance gives us clear clues as to a person's personality without him/her ever having to speak or move.[16][21][22][23]​ Women tend to be better than men at judging nonverbal behavior.[16]​ After viewing pictures of people in a neutral position and in a self-chosen posed position, observers were accurate at judging the target's levels of extraversion, emotional stability, openness, self-esteem, and religiosity.[22]​ The combined impression of physical characteristics, body posture, facial expression, and clothing choices lets observers form accurate images of a target's personality, so long as the person observed is presenting themselves genuinely.[22][13]​ However, there is some conflicting data in this field. Other evidence suggests that people sometimes rely too much on appearance cues over actual information.[24][25]​ When provided with descriptive information about a target, participants still rely on physical appearance cues when making judgments about others' personalities and capabilities. Participants struggle to look past physical appearance cues even when they know information contrary to their initial judgment.[24]​ Physical cues are also used to make judgments about political candidates based on extremely brief exposures to their pictures.[25]​ Perceived competence level of a candidate measured from first impressions of facial features can directly predict voting results.[25]

The “beautiful is good” effect is a very present phenomenon when dealing with first impressions of others.[16]​ Targets who are attractive are rated more positively and as possessing more unique characteristics than those who are unattractive.[26]​ Beauty is also found to be somewhat subjective so that even targets who are not universally attractive can receive the benefit of this effect if the observer is attracted to them.[26]

In a 2014 study, a group at the University of York reported that impressions of the traits of approachability, youthfulness/attractiveness and dominance can be formed from measurable characteristics such as the shape of and the spacing around the eyes, nose and mouth.[27]​ it was found that first impressions of social traits, such as trustworthiness or dominance, are reliably perceived in faces. Physical facial features were objectively measured from feature positions and colours. A neural network was used to model the dimensions of approachability, youthful-attractiveness and dominance. 58% of the variance in raters’ impressions was accounted for by this linear model.[28]

Cosmética y confección

Cosmetic use is also an important cue for forming impressions, particularly of women. Those wearing heavy makeup are seen as significantly more feminine than those wearing moderate makeup or no makeup and those wearing heavy or moderate makeup are seen as more attractive than those wearing no makeup.[23]​ While a woman wearing no makeup is perceived as being more moral than the other two conditions, there is no difference between experimental conditions when judging personality or personal temperament.[23]

First impression formation can be influenced by the use of cognitive short hands such as stereotypes and representative heuristics.[16]​ When asked to rate the socioeconomic status (SES) and degree of interest in friendship with African American and Caucasian female models wearing either a K-Mart, Abercrombie & Fitch, or non-logoed sweatshirt, Caucasian models were rated more favorably than the African American models.[29]​ Abercrombie & Fitch wearers were rated as higher SES than the other sweatshirts. Participants wanted to be friends with the Caucasian model most when she was wearing a plain sweatshirt and the African American model most when she was wearing either the plain or K-Mart sweatshirt. It is unclear why the plain sweatshirt was most associated with friendship, but the general results suggest that mismatching class and race reduced the model's friendship appeal.[29]

Contextos específicos

Internet

Online profiles and communication channels such as email provide fewer cues than in-person interactions, which makes targets more difficult to understand.[16]​ When research participants were asked to evaluate a person's facial attractiveness and perceived ambition based on an online dating profile, amount of time permitted for processing and reporting an evaluation of the target produced a difference in impression formation.[30]​ Spontaneous evaluations relied on physical attractiveness almost exclusively, whereas deliberate evaluations weighed both types of information. Although deliberate evaluations used the information provided on both physical attractiveness and ambition of each target, the particular impact of each kind of information appeared to depend on the consistency between the two. A significant effect of attractiveness on deliberate evaluations was found only when perceived ambition was consistent with the perceived level of attractiveness.[30]​ The consistency found in profiles seemed to particularly influence deliberate evaluations.

In a study of online impressions, participants who were socially expressive and disclosed a lot about themselves both on their webpages and in person were better liked than those who were less open. Social expressivity includes liveliness in voice, smiling, etc.[31]

Citas y sexualidad

Upon seeing photographs of straight, gay, and bisexual people, participants correctly identified gay versus straight males and females at above-chance levels based solely on seeing a picture of their face, however, bisexual targets were only identified at chance. The findings suggest a straight-non straight dichotomy in the categorization of sexual orientation.[21]

The more time participants are allowed to make some judgment about a person, the more they will weigh information beyond physical appearance. Specific manipulations include identifying men as gay versus straight[32]​ and people as trustworthy or not.[33][12]​ In a study of the interaction between ratings of people in speed dating and the form of media used to present them, impression accuracy in a speed dating task was not significantly different when a potential date was presented in person versus in a video. However, impressions of dates made via video were to be much more negative than those made in person. An additional study that looked at characterization of a romantic partner suggested that people are more likely to rely on “gut reactions” when meeting in person, but there isn't sufficient information for this kind of evaluation when viewing someone online.

Profesional

Non-verbal behaviors are particularly important to forming first impressions when meeting a business acquaintance.[34]​ Specifically, components of social expressivity, such as smiling, eyebrow position, emotional expression, and eye contact are emphasized.[13][31][34]​ Straightening one's posture, leaning in slightly, and giving a firm handshake promotes favorable impression formation in the American business context.[34]​ Other impression management tactics in the business world include researching the organization and interviewers beforehand, preparing specific questions for the interviewer, showing confidence, and dressing appropriately.[35]

A qualitative review of previous literature looking at self-report data suggests that men and women use impression management tactics in the corporate world that are consistent with stereotypical gender roles when presenting themselves to others.[36]​ This research proposes that women are put in a double bind where those who portray themselves as more communal and submissive are overlooked for leadership positions and women who try to utilize male tactics (such as being more aggressive) receive negative consequences for violating normative gender roles.[36]​ To change this dynamic the authors suggest that managerial positions should be re-advertised to highlight the feminine qualities needed for a position and staff training should involve a segment accentuating gender issues in the office to make everyone aware of possible discrimination.[36]

Data collected from interviews with physicians distinguishes between first impressions and intuition and contributes to understanding the occurrence of gut feelings in the medical field.[37]​ Gut feelings go beyond first impressions: Physicians expressed feeling doubtful about their initial impressions as they gathered more data from their patients. More experienced physicians reported more instances of gut feelings than those less experienced, but the quality of the intuition was related to the quality of feedback received during the data collection process in general. Emotional engagement enhanced learning just as it does in first impressions.[37]

Neurociencias

First impressions are formed within milliseconds of seeing a target. When intentionally forming a first impression, encoding relies on the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC).[38]​ Readings from fMRIs of research participants show that processing of diagnostic information (e.g. distinguishing features) engaged the dmPFC more than processing neutral information.[38]

Participants generally formed more negative impressions of the faces that showed a negative emotion compared to neutral faces.[39]​ Results suggest that the dmPFC and amygdala together play a large role in negative impression formation. When forming immediate impressions based on emotion, the stimulus can bypass the neo-cortex by way of the “amygdala hijack.”[40]

Familiaridad

Research indicates that people are efficient evaluators when forming impressions based on existing biases.[41]​ The posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), amygdala, and the thalamus sort relevant versus irrelevant information according to these biases. The dmPFC is also involved in the impression formation process, especially with person-descriptive information.[41]

FMRI results show activation of the fusiform cortex, posterior cingulate gyrus, and amygdala when individuals are asked to identify previously seen faces that were encoded as either “friends” or “foes.”[42]​ Additionally, the caudate and anterior cingulate cortex are more activated when looking at faces of “foes” versus “friends."[42]​ This research suggests that quick first impressions of hostility or support from unknown people can lead to long-term effects on memory that will later be associated with that person.

Alcohol e impresiones

Alcohol consumption and belief of consumption influenced emotion detection in ten second clips.[43]​ Participants who thought they had consumed an alcoholic beverage rated one facial expression (approximately 3% of the facial expressions they saw) more in each clip as happy compared to the control group. Thus, impression formation may be affected by even the perception of alcohol consumption.[43]

Diferencias interculturales

There appears to be cross-cultural similarities in brain responses to first impression formations. In a mock election both American and Japanese individuals voted for the candidate that elicited a stronger response in their bilateral amygdala than those who did not, regardless of the candidate's culture.[44]​ Individuals also showed a stronger response to cultural outgroup faces than cultural ingroup faces because the amygdala is presumably more sensitive to novel stimuli.[44]​ However, this finding was unrelated to actual voting decisions.[44]

Estabilidad

Once formed, first impressions tend to be stable. A review of the literature on the accuracy and impact of first impressions on rater-based assessments found that raters' first impressions are highly correlated with later scores, but it is unclear exactly why.[45]​ One study tested stability by asking participants to form impressions people based purely on photographs. Participants' opinions of the people in photographs did not significantly differ after interacting with that person a month later.[32]​ One potential reason for this stability is that one's first impressions could serve as a guide for his/her next steps, such as what questions are asked and how raters go about scoring. More research needs to be done on the stability of first impressions to fully understand how first impressions guide subsequent treatment, self-fulfilling prophecies, and the halo effect.[16]​ Assessment tools can influence impressions too, for example if a question provides only a dichotomous "yes" or "no" response or if a rater uses a scale (ratio). Although this study was conducted with the intention of improving rating methods in medical education, the literature review was sufficiently broad enough to generalize.[32]

Véase también

Referencias

  1. a b Mackie, Eliot R. Smith, Diane M. (2007). Social psychology (3rd edición). Hove: Psychology Press. ISBN 1841694096. Consultado el 8 de mayo de 2014. 
  2. Flora, Carlin. «The First Impression». Psychology Today. Archivado desde el original el 20 de febrero de 2011. Consultado el 20 de febrero de 2011. 
  3. Aronson, Elliot, Robin M. Akert, Timothy D. Wilson (2007). Social psychology (6th edición). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0132382458. Consultado el 05/08/14. 
  4. Biesanz, J.C.; Human, L. J.; Paquin, A.; Chan, M.; Parisotto, K. L.; Sarracino, J.; Gillis, R. L. (2011). «Do we know when our impressions of others are valid? evidence for realistic accuracy awareness in first impressions of personality». Social Psychological and Personality Science 2 (5): 452-459. doi:10.1177/1948550610397211. 
  5. Bhargrave, R; Montgomery, N.V. «The social context of temporal sequences: Why first impressions shape shared experiences». Journal of Consumer Research 40 (3): 501-517. doi:10.1086/671053. 
  6. Ding, Jonathan Y. C.; Rule, Nicholas O. (12 January 2012). «Gay, Straight, or Somewhere in Between: Accuracy and Bias in the Perception of Bisexual Faces». Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 36 (2): 165-176. doi:10.1007/s10919-011-0129-y. 
  7. Naumann, L. P.; Vazire, S.; Rentfrow, P. J.; Gosling, S. D. (17 September 2009). «Personality Judgments Based on Physical Appearance». Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35 (12): 1661-1671. PMID 19762717. doi:10.1177/0146167209346309. 
  8. Trudeau, M. (5 de mayo de 2014). «You Had Me At Hello: The Science Behind First Impressions». Consultado el 6 de mayo de 2014. 
  9. Guadagno, Rosanna E.; Cialdini, Robert B. (21 March 2007). «Gender Differences in Impression Management in Organizations: A Qualitative Review». Sex Roles 56 (7–8): 483-494. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9187-3. 
  10. Wood, T.J. (August 2014). «Exploring the role of first impressions in rater-based assessments». Advances in Health Sciences Education 19 (3): 409-427. doi:10.1007/s10459-013-9453-9. 
  11. a b c d Willis, J.; Todorov, A. (2006). «First impressions: Making up your mind after 100 ms exposure to a face». Psychological Science 17: 592-598. PMID 16866745. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x. Consultado el 17 de mayo de 2014. 
  12. a b c Wargo, E (2006). «How many seconds to a first impression?». The Observer 19. 
  13. a b c Error en la cita: Etiqueta <ref> no válida; no se ha definido el contenido de las referencias llamadas Carlin2
  14. a b Zebrowitz, Leslie A.; Franklin, Robert G.; Hillman, Suzanne; Boc, Henry. «Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: Similar in agreement but different in positivity.». Psychology and Aging 28 (1): 202-212. PMC 3968687. doi:10.1037/a0030927. 
  15. a b c d Error en la cita: Etiqueta <ref> no válida; no se ha definido el contenido de las referencias llamadas Bhargrave2
  16. a b c d e f g h Error en la cita: Etiqueta <ref> no válida; no se ha definido el contenido de las referencias llamadas Aronson2
  17. a b c Fang, X.; Rajkumar, T. M. (2013). «The Role of National Culture and Multimedia on First Impression Bias Reduction: An Experimental Study in US and China». IEEE Transactions On Professional Communication 56 (4): 354-371. doi:10.1109/TPC.2013.2251503. 
  18. a b Lim, K. H.; Benbasat, I.; Ward, L. M. (2000). «The role of multimedia in changing first impression bias». Information Systems Research 11 (2): 115-136. doi:10.1287/isre.11.2.115.11776. 
  19. a b Deprez-Sims, Anne-Sophie; Morris, Scott B. «Accents in the workplace: Their effects during a job interview». International Journal of Psychology 45 (6): 417-426. doi:10.1080/00207594.2010.499950. 
  20. a b Zebrowitz, L. A.; Wang, R.; Bronstad, P. M.; Eisenberg, D.; Undurraga, E.; Reyes-Garcia, V.; Godoy, R. (19 December 2011). «First Impressions From Faces Among U.S. and Culturally Isolated Tsimane' People in the Bolivian Rainforest». Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43 (1): 119-134. doi:10.1177/0022022111411386. 
  21. a b Error en la cita: Etiqueta <ref> no válida; no se ha definido el contenido de las referencias llamadas Ding2
  22. a b c Error en la cita: Etiqueta <ref> no válida; no se ha definido el contenido de las referencias llamadas Naumann2
  23. a b c Workman, J. E.; Johnson, K. K. P. (1 September 1991). «The Role of Cosmetics in Impression Formation». Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 10 (1): 63-67. doi:10.1177/0887302X9101000109. 
  24. a b Olivola, Christopher Y.; Todorov, Alexander. «Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences». Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46 (2): 315-324. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.002. 
  25. a b c Todorov, A. (10 June 2005). «Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes». Science 308 (5728): 1623-1626. doi:10.1126/science.1110589. 
  26. a b Lorenzo, G. L.; Biesanz, J. C.; Human, L. J. (4 November 2010). «What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood: Physical Attractiveness and Accuracy in First Impressions of Personality». Psychological Science 21 (12): 1777-1782. PMID 21051521. doi:10.1177/0956797610388048. 
  27. «First impressions connected to facial features - CNN.com». Edition.cnn.com. Consultado el 1 August 2014. 
  28. «Modeling first impressions from highly variable facial images». Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: E3353-E3361. 28 de julio de 2014. PMC 4136614. doi:10.1073/pnas.1409860111. Consultado el 1 August 2014. 
  29. a b McDermott, L.; Pettijohn, T. (2011). «The influence of clothing fashion and race on the perceived socioeconomic status and person perception of college students». Psychology & Society 4: 64-75. 
  30. a b Sritharan, R.; Heilpern, K.; Wilbur, C. J.; Gawronski, B. (2010). «I think I like you: Spontaneous and deliberate evaluations of potential romantic partners in an online dating context». European Journal of Social Psychology 40: 1062-1077. doi:10.1002/ejsp.703. 
  31. a b Weisbuch, M.; Ivcevic, Z.; Ambady, N. (2009). «On being liked on the web and in the 'real world': Consistency in first impressions across personal web pages and spontaneous behavior». Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (3): 573-576. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.009. 
  32. a b c Wood, J. «The Power of a First Impression». Psych Central. Consultado el 6 de mayo de 2014. 
  33. Error en la cita: Etiqueta <ref> no válida; no se ha definido el contenido de las referencias llamadas Biesanz2
  34. a b c Goman, Carol Kinsey (2008). The nonverbal advantage : secrets and science of body language at work ([Online-Ausg.]. edición). San Francisco, Calif.: Berrett-Koehler Publishers. ISBN 1576754928. 
  35. Rowh, Mark. «First Impressions Count». American Psychological Association. Consultado el 18 April 2014. 
  36. a b c Error en la cita: Etiqueta <ref> no válida; no se ha definido el contenido de las referencias llamadas Guadagno2
  37. a b Woolley, A.; Kostopoulou, O. (2013). «Clinical intuition in family medicine: More than first impressions». Annals of Family Medicine 11: 60-66. doi:10.1370/afm.1433. 
  38. a b Gilron, R.; Gutchess, A. H. (2012). «Remembering first impressions: Effects of intentionality and diagnosticity on subsequent memory». Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 12 (1): 85-98. doi:10.3758/s13415-011-0074-6. 
  39. Iidaka, T.; Harada, T.; Sadato, N. (2011). «Forming a negative impression of another person correlates with activation in medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala». Social Cognitive and Affective Neurosciene 6 (4): 516-525. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq072. 
  40. Goleman, Daniel (1999). Working with Emotional Intelligence. p. 87. 
  41. a b Schiller, D.; Freeman, J. B.; Mitchell, J. P.; Uleman, J. S.; Phelps, E. A. (2009). «A neural mechanism of first impressions». Nature Neuroscience 12: 508-514. doi:10.1038/nn.2278. 
  42. a b Vrticka, Pascal; Andersson, Frédéric; Sander, David; Vuilleumier, Patrik. «Memory for friends or foes: The social context of past encounters with faces modulates their subsequent neural traces in the brain». Social Neuroscience 4 (5): 384-401. doi:10.1080/17470910902941793. 
  43. a b Walter, N.; Mutic, S.; Markett, S.; Montag, C.; Klein, A.; Reuter, M. (2011). «The Influence of Alcohol Intake and Alcohol Expectations on the Recognition of Emotions». Alcohol and Alcoholism 46: 680-685. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agr082. 
  44. a b c Rule, N. O.; Freeman, J. B.; Moran, J. M.; Gabrieli, J. D. E.; Adams, R. B.; Ambady, N. (5 December 2009). «Voting behavior is reflected in amygdala response across cultures». Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5 (2–3): 349-355. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp046. 
  45. Error en la cita: Etiqueta <ref> no válida; no se ha definido el contenido de las referencias llamadas Wood2