Usuario discusión:GreekNikoss
Victory
[editar]Thank you for your message. I'm sorry to tell you that your arguments seem fallacious to me. That "Nowone in Greece describes this party like that" is too gross a generalization. Furthermore, assuming it were true, Wikipedia does not have to be guided by exclusively Greek parameters.
On the other hand, the party has confessed ties to Mount Athos and has expressed its intention to literally create a "Christian-centered governance" (ie, a clearly theocratic system). Isn't that fundamentalism?
Sorry, but I'll keep reverting your edits until you understand. Greece is not the only country that exists in the world. Marval703 (discusión) 19:14 26 jun 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for replying.
- Well you misunderstood what i wanted to say.In meant this certain article does not represent the reality.Kathimerini supports a certain political party in Greece. What being said about connections with Mount Athos has been denied from both sides Victory and the monasteries.
- I said that nowone in Greece describes the party like that to clarify after interviews, speeches and so the fundamentalism didn't came up for this party.
- You might have your own view but i speak from inside and i see that you clearly are not informed well.
- I am not going to keep reverting your edit i am just letting you know that you are completely wrong and might need to make a deeper research before making conclusions. 62.74.18.121 (discusión) 20:07 26 jun 2023 (UTC)
- Even if the entire content of the article was false, which I doubt, the party's own statements suggest that they want to establish a theocracy. That is enough to classify them as fundamentalists. Marval703 (discusión) 20:59 26 jun 2023 (UTC)
- This not how it works and you can't judge the Greek political scene by reading one article.The Spanish version of this party will stay problematic since you choose to add your own view on a Greek political party. GreekNikoss (discusión) 22:39 26 jun 2023 (UTC)
- I´m not talking about the article. I´m talking about the party's OWN statements. Marval703 (discusión) 08:13 27 jun 2023 (UTC)
- You still cant understan because you have no clue what the party have stated.
- If you really are open to learn then you should know that the president of the party said that they are NOT a christian party they are a democratic patriotic movement BUT they are orthodox christians.
- Dont act like you know everything and i dont really care how the spanish verison will be i just want to help. GreekNikoss (discusión) 08:52 27 jun 2023 (UTC)
- I´m not talking about the article. I´m talking about the party's OWN statements. Marval703 (discusión) 08:13 27 jun 2023 (UTC)
- This not how it works and you can't judge the Greek political scene by reading one article.The Spanish version of this party will stay problematic since you choose to add your own view on a Greek political party. GreekNikoss (discusión) 22:39 26 jun 2023 (UTC)
- Even if the entire content of the article was false, which I doubt, the party's own statements suggest that they want to establish a theocracy. That is enough to classify them as fundamentalists. Marval703 (discusión) 20:59 26 jun 2023 (UTC)