User talk:Anon user 2x8yFhQ4wm

May 2023

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf^(talk) 01:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anon user 2x8yFhQ4wm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was wrongly blocked. My username is just my username, it's not a business. I tried adding an external link to an academic article I wrote on markov decision processes on the markov decision process Wikipedia page. The change got reverted because apparently it is disallowed to enrich Wikipedia with links to relevant resources for a person wandering on that page. I did not try to re-add the edit. Devspaceship (talk) 11:55 pm, Yesterday (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

It is the name of a website. You will not be unblocked to spam links to your website or to anything else. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anon user 2x8yFhQ4wm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The previous administrator clearly did not read my appeal. I wanted to add a link to an article I wrote. I was explained I couldn't. I DID NOT TRY TO RE-ADD THE LINK. However I got accused of wanting to spam, even if my account would be unblocked. Devspaceship (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 11:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anon user 2x8yFhQ4wm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

anon_user_2x8yFhQ4wm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I wanted to add a link I thought was relevant. I was explained it wasn't. I did not try to re-add the change. However, the next day I was blocked out of the blue.

Yes, I made a mistake, I am human, it happens. I accepted that and moved on with my life. Why getting indefinitely blocked afterwards while I already took into account what was said to me and did not try to re-add the edit?

I always saw Wikipedia as one of the greatest achievement of humanity. My current disappointment has no bounds. Devspaceship (talk) 09:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your choice of new username would be acceptable. You are not blocked for edit warring("readd the edit"). You are blocked for promotional editing because you edited about your website, which is a severe conflict of interest. This great achievement of humanity is not here for you to spam your website. If you want to edit about topics for which you have no conflict of interest, please tell what. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:11, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Anon user 2x8yFhQ4wm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

anon_user_2x8yFhQ4wm (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Request reason:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.

I do not receive any compensation. I just thought (at the time) that an article about markov decision processes had its place in the external links of the page about markov decision processes.

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.

The edit linked to my article, which is a conflict of interest. I did one mistake that I did not repeat. (The fact that I did not try to re-add the edit is proof that I understood my mistake).

Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

I intend to use Wikipedia in its intended use and not repeat the mistake that I did once due to ignorance of certain Wikipedia rules that I now understand.

Some examples of edits I did in the past:

When I did not have an account yet, I added a derivation of a physics formula that was present in an English page to a French page while adapting the notation to match the French notation.
With this account, I added the precision that the dotnet framework from Microsoft was now cross platform and installable on Linux and MacOS as well.

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Anon user 2x8yFhQ4wm}} on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=anon_user_2x8yFhQ4wm | 3=


Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
I do not receive any compensation. I just thought (at the time) that an article about markov decision processes had its place in the external links of the page about markov decision processes.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
The edit linked to my article, which is a conflict of interest. I did one mistake that I did not repeat. (The fact that I did not try to re-add the edit is proof that I understood my mistake).
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
I intend to use Wikipedia in its intended use and not repeat the mistake that I did once due to ignorance of certain Wikipedia rules that I now understand.
Some examples of edits I did in the past:

When I did not have an account yet, I added a derivation of a physics formula that was present in an English page to a French page while adapting the notation to match the French notation.
With this account, I added the precision that the dotnet framework from Microsoft was now cross platform and installable on Linux and MacOS as well.

| 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=anon_user_2x8yFhQ4wm | reason=


Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
I do not receive any compensation. I just thought (at the time) that an article about markov decision processes had its place in the external links of the page about markov decision processes.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
The edit linked to my article, which is a conflict of interest. I did one mistake that I did not repeat. (The fact that I did not try to re-add the edit is proof that I understood my mistake).
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
I intend to use Wikipedia in its intended use and not repeat the mistake that I did once due to ignorance of certain Wikipedia rules that I now understand.
Some examples of edits I did in the past:

When I did not have an account yet, I added a derivation of a physics formula that was present in an English page to a French page while adapting the notation to match the French notation.
With this account, I added the precision that the dotnet framework from Microsoft was now cross platform and installable on Linux and MacOS as well.

| accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=anon_user_2x8yFhQ4wm | reason=


Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
I do not receive any compensation. I just thought (at the time) that an article about markov decision processes had its place in the external links of the page about markov decision processes.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
The edit linked to my article, which is a conflict of interest. I did one mistake that I did not repeat. (The fact that I did not try to re-add the edit is proof that I understood my mistake).
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
I intend to use Wikipedia in its intended use and not repeat the mistake that I did once due to ignorance of certain Wikipedia rules that I now understand.
Some examples of edits I did in the past:

When I did not have an account yet, I added a derivation of a physics formula that was present in an English page to a French page while adapting the notation to match the French notation.
With this account, I added the precision that the dotnet framework from Microsoft was now cross platform and installable on Linux and MacOS as well.

| decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

Devspaceship (talk) 12:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexf: OK to unblock. New user name choice aboe=ve. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Ok to unblock after the account's rename is done. I accept the explanation with the caveat that - as said before - spamming your own website is not acceptable. -- Alexf^(talk) 11:12, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]